{"id":161,"date":"2017-04-30T11:50:14","date_gmt":"2017-04-30T09:50:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/?p=161"},"modified":"2020-10-02T14:30:37","modified_gmt":"2020-10-02T12:30:37","slug":"fascicolo-12-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/fascicolo-12-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Issue 12 | 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Effetto Trump?
\nGli Stati Uniti nel sistema internazionale Fra continuit\u00e0 e mutamento<\/h2>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"Il volume propone una lettura non effimera, in quanto non appiattita sull\u2019attualit\u00e0 ma collocata in un\u2019ottica di pi\u00f9 lungo periodo, delle possibili trasformazioni dello scenario internazionale indotte dall\u2019elezione di Donald Trump a Presidente degli Stati Uniti, che restano pur sempre un attore globale, l\u2019unico in grado di influenzare tutte le aree geopolitiche. Si inserisce quindi nella tradizione della \u201cscuola storica di analisi delle relazioni internazionali\u201d che ha il suo centro nel Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche dell\u2019Universit\u00e0 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e ha prodotto, tra l\u2019altro, precedenti volumi di questa collana.
\nIn misura diversa secondo la disciplina di riferimento degli autori \u2013 storici delle relazioni internazionali, storici di specifiche aree geopolitiche, storici delle istituzioni politiche, scienziati della politica e cultori di studi strategici \u2013 la profondit\u00e0 storica dell\u2019analisi \u00e8 comunque presente. Parallelamente anche gli storici non rifuggono dall\u2019uso di categorie politologiche. Si attua quindi non un\u2019ibrida interdisciplinariet\u00e0, che talvolta si riscontra in opere di geopolitica ove si piega l\u2019analisi storica al servizio di una tesi, ma un fecondo approccio multidisciplinare. Non a caso questo volume \u00e8 il prodotto di una comunit\u00e0 scientifica nella quale \u00e8 ancora viva l\u2019eredit\u00e0 di Gianfranco Miglio, Preside per un trentennio della Facolt\u00e0 di Scienze Politiche dell\u2019Universit\u00e0 Cattolica e Docente per sette anni anche di Storia dei trattati e politica internazionale, per il quale la storia \u00e8 il laboratorio privilegiato della ricerca politologica.
\nPur nella variet\u00e0 dei temi e delle metodologie, una constatazione sembra accomunare i diversi saggi. Lo sguardo lungo, proiettato su un passato pi\u00f9 o meno recente, permette di ridimensionare la sensazione di rottura che la presidenza Trump pare rappresentare agli occhi degli osservatori pi\u00f9 appiattiti sugli aspetti superficiali dell\u2019attualit\u00e0. Non che si voglia del tutto negare la \u201cnovit\u00e0\u201d rappresentata dal quarantacinquesimo Presidente degli Stati Uniti; la si colloca per\u00f2 nel quadro di mutamenti derivanti da \u201cforze profonde\u201d delle quali Trump \u00e8 l\u2019approdo. E le \u201cnovit\u00e0\u201d sono talvolta un ritorno a passate esperienze. Rileva ad esempio Enrico Fassi che \u00abl\u2019apparente svolta incarnata dalla presidenza Trump potrebbe rivelarsi molto pi\u00f9 in continuit\u00e0 con le precedenti amministrazioni USA di quanto inizialmente ritenuto\u00bb.
\nA pochi mesi dall\u2019insediamento, la politica estera di Trump \u00e8 molto in fieri, con enunciati ancora tutti da concretizzare, come il desiderio di un rapporto costruttivo con la Russia, sfuggito completamente a Barack Obama, e la volont\u00e0 di ridefinire, attraverso un duro confronto, la politica con la Cina, dichiarazioni poi fortemente ridimensionate, come quelle alquanto sprezzanti verso la NATO e i ruoli ancora da definire degli attori istituzionali all\u2019interno della sua amministrazione.<\/p>\n

<\/a>I<\/a>ndice<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Massimo de Leonardis<\/strong>, Introduzione<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 This book examines the possible changes which the new US President Trump may introduce in the international arena. In accordance with the academic tradition of the Department of Political Sciences of the Catholic University, the volume presents the results of a multidisciplinary and multipronged research, concentrating on both political and historical aspects. The historical perspective is intertwined to an in-depth analysis of present challenges. As an example of the issues addressed, we may mention the evolution of the Anglo-American special relationship, in particular after Brexit, the \u2013 only apparently \u2013 new approach of the US towards China, its relationship with the Russian Federation, in light of the most recent developments in the Middle Eastern area; finally, particular attention is also ensured to the discussion of the Euro-Atlantic relationship. Moreover, there will be an essay dedicated to the US domestic politics. As a result of this study, it will emerge how the new US presidency marks no sharp breaches in the American political tradition. In spite of the difficulties posed by a research conducted on current and contemporary challenges, the present collection of essays will try to respond to the need of a better comprehension of the international reality.<\/p>\n

Enrico Fassi<\/strong>, La fine dell\u2019ordine occidentale? Liberalismo e multilateralismo alla prova del \u201cterremoto\u201d Trump<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 The election of Donald Trump as 45th President of the United States has been associated by many observers to a threat to the liberal order and to the sunset of US hegemony. To some extent, both perspectives seem exaggerated, or at least premature. Nevertheless, a reflection on the \u201chealth status\u201d of the liberal order, and on the role that the United States has had in its construction and its maintenance \u2013 and in what emerges as a likely disinvestment \u2013 seems particularly appropriate. The paper thus focuses on two fundamental characteristics of the order emerged in the West after the Second World War: its multilateral structure, on the one hand, and the liberal approach (in the peculiar form of the \u201cembedded liberalism\u201d), on the other. Both aspects, though still characterizing this order, have in fact undergone significant transformations due to changes in the systemic structure and the relative power position of the hegemonic State, and to the concrete policies it implemented. In light of these considerations, the apparent breakthrough embodied by Trump presidency could prove far more continuity with previous US administrations than initially believed. Moreover, structural changes of international politics that alter the nature of the actors involved might contribute to add further complexity to the current uncertain picture.<\/p>\n

Gianluca Pastori<\/strong>, Dividere il fardello: Stati Uniti ed Europa da Barack Obama a Donald Trump<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 Burden sharing is a traditionally contentious issue in Euro-Atlantic relations. The origin of the problem dates back to the same origin of the Atlantic Alliance and quarrels on \u201cwho have to pay for what\u201d have systematically emerged in times of crisis. During his campaign, Donald Trump played heavily on the issue, and after the election repeatedly reiterated his will to \u201cmake Europe pay\u201d for US military assistance. Trump\u2019s abrasive rhetoric has raised concerns among European \u00e9lites, especially in the central-eastern part of the continent, where fears of Russian expansionism are widespread. However, Trump\u2019s rhetoric is nothing new. Obama too, in many occasions, waved the flag of burden sharing, the last time during NATO Warsaw summit in July 2016. Just like Obama and his predecessors, Trump will have to modulate his attitude according to the international context. In this perspective, his ability to re-establish better relations with Russia will be pivotal in shaping his posture towards the European allies. Currently, many important issues still divide Moscow from Washington, ranging from Ukraine to Syria, Libya and nuclear proliferation. Moreover, the Congress will probably closely scrutinize the action of the (supposedly) pro-Russia President. All these elements conjure in making d\u00e9tente a long-term aim. In the meantime, the fear of US disengagement could provide new fuel to Europe\u2019s efforts to put its defence and security policy on a sounder basis.<\/p>\n

Davide Borsani<\/strong>, Ritorno all\u2019Anglosfera? Una prospettiva storica sui rapporti tra Gran Bretagna e Stati Uniti al tempo di Trump<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 The outcome of the Brexit referendum and the election of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States laid the foundation for the strengthening of the Anglo-American special relationship in the name of the principle of national sovereignty and in presence of a shared strategic threat \u2013 the Islamic international terrorism. When the British Prime Minister, Theresa May, announced the return to Global Britain, the first countries rushing to her support were the former Imperial Dominions, particularly Australia, Canada and New Zealand, now allies and partners of the United States through security treaties and free trade agreements. Moreover, for cultural and personal reasons, President Trump seems to have an Anglophile bias. The United States and Great Britain, thus, have decided to start bilateral talks in order to reach a free trade agreement, which would have a strong political meaning. In a transitional phase for the international system, the convergence between Great Britain, the United States, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, which form together the Anglosphere, can be also a positive factor for the West as a whole.<\/p>\n

Valentina Villa<\/strong>, Royal greeting: i rapporti anglo-americani attraverso Europea e Stati Uniti all\u2019ombra della paralisi del TTIP l\u2019analisi degli incontri ufficiali tra Presidente e Monarca<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 Nowadays American Presidents spend more and more time meeting with foreign leaders. This activity is considered \u201chigh-level public diplomacy\u201d and it saw a six fold increase in the last seventy years; therefore, it is necessary to analyse not only the relationships with Britain\u2019s Heads of Government, but also with its Head of State: the Monarch. Indeed, the study of the interactions between the President and the Sovereign takes on remarkable importance as it allows to examine the diplomatic bilateral activity on a different level compared to that usually reserved for Prime Ministers and Secretaries of State. In the XXth century the British Monarchs have proved to be able to use their room of manoeuvre to reach important foreign policy goals. Besides reconstructing in wide terms the framework of the official meetings between American Presidents and British Monarchs from the first post-war period to date, this study aims to deepen in particular two relevant occasions: the trip of George VI to America in June 1939, at President Roosevelt\u2019s invitation, and the State Visit of October 1957 paid by Queen Elizabeth II to President Eisenhower.<\/p>\n

Antonio Zotti<\/strong>, Quel che resta del partenariato strategico: prospettive frustrate e tensioni riemergenti <\/em>nei rapporti fra Unione Europea e Stati Uniti all\u2019ombra della paralisi del TTIP<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 Transatlantic relations have long been serving as the ultimate \u201csupply\u201d of strategic contents in the EU\u2019s external action, if not the EU politics as such. The Strategic Partnership (SP) may be regarded as one of the latest expressions of this aspect of the EU-US connection. The instrument, aimed at boosting the EU\u2019s actorness and attuning it to the current configuration of the international system, has largely been dismissed as ineffective and inconsistent when applied to bilateral relations with (emerging) powers \u2013 with the significant exception of its transatlantic realization, embodied in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Unlike others, this partnership hinged on some of the EU\u2019s \u201cstrongest suits\u201d, emphasizing its identity and agenda as a \u201cmarket power\u201d \u2013 both in a \u201cmaterial\u201d and a \u201cnormative\u201d perspective. In doing so, the TTIP reaffirmed and further articulated the tenet of economic openness as a pivotal element of the international order endorsed by the two parties. That being so, the uncertain fate looming over the SP since the current US administration took office, far from being just another fiasco of the EU\u2019s wishful foreign policy, may well be the harbinger of much more momentous changes in the transatlantic and international orders.<\/p>\n

Mireno Berrettini<\/strong>, American (next) Pacific Century? Gli Stati Uniti di Donald Trump alla fine della \u00abGreat Divergence\u00bb<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 This essay analyzes, from a global and long-term historical perspective, the Sino-US diplomatic tensions arisen after the Donald J. Trump\u2019s election as President of the United States. In the broader system of international relations, the so-called \u201crise of China\u201d and the increasing political and economic dynamism of the new Asian Great Powers are leading to the closure of the Euro-Atlantic global hegemonic cycle, begun with the \u00abGreat Divergence\u00bb in the late XVIIIth century and enshrined by the Opium Wars in the second half of the XIXth. Despite an unconventional diplomatic style, the new Republican President and his administration are facing these systemic transformations in the field of world politics, trying to create a new architecture of global governance, aiming at maintaining the United States\u2019 leadership within a world system that is structurally transiting from an hegemony to another, while is moving from the unipolar condition to a multipolar one.<\/p>\n

Carlo Frappi, <\/strong>Trump, La Russia e le sfide regionali: il fallimento della strategia del congagement<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 In the aftermath of the Russian Federation\u2019s regressive and revolutionary intervention in the Ukrainian crisis, the choices that the Trump Administration is called upon to implement towards Moscow represent a key challenge for the White House as well as an important test for the management of the most important vectors of the US foreign policy. Besides concerning the institutional future of Ukraine, the crisis affects the most important elements of Russian-US bilateral relationship and, more generally, of the post-bipolar systematization of the Eurasian area. Against this background, the essay aims to frame the challenges brought by Moscow to the Trump Administration in the broader context of the post-bipolar relations between Washington and Moscow. In particular, it aims to frame the need to reinvent the US Russian policy within the failure of the traditional congagement strategy pursued toward Moscow.<\/p>\n

Andrea Plebani<\/strong>, Stati Uniti e Siraq tra disengagement, frammentazione e agende contrapposte<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 More than six years after the outbreak of the Arab Spring, both Syria and Iraq have to cope with a series of challenges threatening their inner coherence and their survival as unitarian states. Deeply divided along ethno-sectarian and regional lines and marked by the emergence of internal oppositions questioning the very legitimacy of their governments, Damascus and Baghdad have witnessed the entrenchment of competing power centers within their own territories backed by a broad array of external players. The involvement of these actors contributed to complicate even further the regional scenario, favoring the overlapping of civil and proxy wars. Moving from these elements the essay aims at tracing the equilibriums dominating the Iraqi and Syrian scenarios, the relations Washington established with the key-players on the ground as well as the policy options the new U.S. administration can count on.<\/p>\n

Cristina Bon<\/strong>, Presidential legacies: l\u2019eredit\u00e0 storica dello spazio di potere amministrativo
\nda Reagan a Trump<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong> \u2013 Over the last fifteen years, there has been a growing consensus among academic studies and news stories about the emergence in the United States of a sort of presidential Monarchy. Thirty years after the decline of Schlesinger\u2019s \u201cImperial Presidency\u201d, a concept used to describe the expansion of presidential powers in the wake of the Cold War, it seems that the US Presidency is experiencing the resurgence of an effective unilateral executive power, both in domestic and foreign policy areas. It should be noted that this presidential discretionary power is primarily administrative in nature and rely not only on executive orders, but also on other \u201ctools\u201d, such as signing statements, memoranda, presidential guidelines, regulatory statutes and, last but not least, the power of appointment. This essay aims at clarifying the nature and extent of the presidential administrative power, which from Reagan to Obama has increased at a fast pace, thanks to factors such as the \u201cpresidentialization\u201d of American politics and the inefficiency of congressional lawmaking. While the first part of the essay places the presidential administrative power in an historical perspective, focusing mainly upon the last thirty-five years, the second part is dedicated to Barack Obama\u2019s use of the presidential administrative action. The result is a sketch of the main trends in the historical development of presidential administrative practices that have become a valuable legacy to any incoming President \u2013 especially so in the case of Donald Trump. These major trends may have important implications as both a source of legitimation of presidential unilateral actions as well as a springboard for the introduction of new and innovative executive power practices.<\/p>\n

Gli Autori<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00c8 possibile scaricare i files della rivista integrale in PDF<\/strong> cliccando qui<\/strong><\/em><\/a>in ePub cliccando qui<\/em><\/strong><\/a>in mobi (formato Kindle) cliccando qui<\/em><\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Effetto Trump? Gli Stati Uniti nel sistema internazionale Fra continuit\u00e0 e mutamento Il volume propone una lettura non effimera, in quanto non appiattita sull\u2019attualit\u00e0 ma collocata in un\u2019ottica di pi\u00f9 lungo periodo, delle possibili trasformazioni dello scenario internazionale indotte dall\u2019elezione di Donald Trump a Presidente degli Stati Uniti, che restano pur sempre un attore globale,…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":739,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archivio"],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":1,"label":"Archivio"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-732x1024.jpg",732,1024,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"Redazione EDUCatt","author_link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/author\/redazione\/"},"comment_info":1,"category_info":[{"term_id":1,"name":"Archivio","slug":"archivio","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":26,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":1,"category_count":26,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Archivio","category_nicename":"archivio","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":false,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769.jpg",1143,1600,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-214x300.jpg",214,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-768x1075.jpg",768,1075,true],"large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-732x1024.jpg",732,1024,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769-1097x1536.jpg",1097,1536,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769.jpg",1143,1600,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/id_181769.jpg",9,12,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Redazione EDUCatt","author_link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/author\/redazione\/"},"uagb_comment_info":1,"uagb_excerpt":"Effetto Trump? Gli Stati Uniti nel sistema internazionale Fra continuit\u00e0 e mutamento Il volume propone una lettura non effimera, in quanto non appiattita sull\u2019attualit\u00e0 ma collocata in un\u2019ottica di pi\u00f9 lungo periodo, delle possibili trasformazioni dello scenario internazionale indotte dall\u2019elezione di Donald Trump a Presidente degli Stati Uniti, che restano pur sempre un attore globale,...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":747,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions\/747"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/739"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}