{"id":943,"date":"2022-03-07T19:31:49","date_gmt":"2022-03-07T18:31:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/?p=943"},"modified":"2023-09-11T15:44:15","modified_gmt":"2023-09-11T13:44:15","slug":"fascicolo-20-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/fascicolo-20-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"Fascicolo 20 | 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Questo numero segna una tappa importante nella vita della rivista:  dieci anni dall\u2019inizio delle pubblicazioni e venti numeri pubblicati. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a>\"\"Indic<\/strong>e<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Massimo de Leonardis<\/strong>, Introduzione<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Massimo de Leonardis<\/strong>, Ottavio Bari\u00e9: Maestro di studi storici e gentiluomo<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Massimo de Leonardis<\/strong>, Santa Sede e Inghilterra: dalla rottura delle relazioni diplomatiche al Congresso di Vienna (1559-1814)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract <\/strong>\u2013 One of the consequences of the Anglican schism was the interruption of the diplomatic relations between the Holy See and the Kingdom of En-gland. The necessary contacts were kept through unof\ufb01cial agents. In particu-lar, the period of the Stuart monarchs witnessed the short re-establishment of  of\ufb01cial diplomatic relations, which on the contrary became impossible when  after the \u201cGlorious Revolution\u201d of 1688\/89 the Pope continued to recognize  as Kings de jure the Catholics James II and his son James Edward. In 1766  Pope Clemente XIII ceased to consider the Stuart as the legitimate kings and  this permitted to resume contacts, which were favoured by the outbreak of the  French revolution, opposed both by Rome and London. The article is the draft  introductory chapter of a volume in preparation on the diplomatic relations  between the Holy See and the United Kingdom between 1815 and 1982.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Antonio Zotti<\/strong>, Oltre le barriere tariffarie: protezionismo e divergenze regolative nelle relazioni
commerciali fra Stati Uniti e Unione Europea durante l\u2019amministrazione Trump<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract <\/strong>\u2013 The article aims at assessing how and to what extent the Trump administration has affected trade relations between the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). In order to do so, and taking into account the general framing of virtually every Trump-related political issue in terms of a \u201cbreak\u201d from business as usual, the article identifies the Trump administration\u2019s consistencies with and deviations from the more traditional course of America\u2019s trade policy,
including the setting off of infamous \u201ctrade wars\u201d. After providing an insight of the US and the US trade policy governance system, the article continues pointing out the regulatory divergence between US and the EU as a relatively overlooked yet critical aspect of their mutual trade relationship \u2013 one where the effects of the Trump administration can be argued to be especially significant, both in economic and political terms. Finally, regulatory divergence is further explored focusing on the different main rationales \u2013 science-based evidence and precautionary principle
\u2013 underpinning US and the EU respective systems of protection against the risks connected to goods and services\u2019 production and exchange.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Francesco Amoretti, Adriano Cozzolino, Diego Giannone<\/strong>, International Financial Institutions and the Rethinking of the State in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization (from the 1990s to Covid-19)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract <\/strong>\u2013 In this paper we analyse the documents of two prominent international financial institutions (IFIs), the IMF and the World Bank, in order to shed light on how these institutions conceived of the role of the State since the 1990s, and legitimated the reform of State institutions. By paying particular attention to the question of State reform, we argue that IFIs played a strategic role in providing for a \u201cglobal\u201d framework to guide and legitimate
the transformations of the State at national level. On more empirical grounds, we perform a diachronic analysis of IFIs\u2019 discourse on the State, by comparing three junctures: (a) the 1990s, i.e. the crucial decade of the \u2018globalization project\u2019, (b) the global financial crisis of 2008 and its aftermath, and (c) the current Covid-19 crisis. Through the development of a detailed account how IFIs conceive the State and its role, the paper aims to make sense of the State\u2013 market relations on a more pragmatic way, and in the light of both junctures of economic expansion and crisis. In the final section, through a preliminary analysis of the documents produced during the Covid-19 pandemic, we highlight also some possible innovations in State discourse compared to the previous phases. In the light of the empirical analysis, the main argument of the paper is that IFIs conceived the State as key to the long-term development and preservation of market economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Davide Antonelli<\/strong>, Dopo l\u201911 settembre 2001, le prime conseguenze del pi\u00f9 grande attentato della storia contemporanea<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract <\/strong>\u2013 Twenty years have passed since the attacks of September 11, 2001, a date that represents one of the most dramatic moments in our recent history. The chronicle is well known: on a late summer morning a perfectly coordinated terrorist commando launches a devastating attack to the heart of the United States of America. Two planes hit the World Trade Center Towers, one the Pentagon and a fourth aircraft crashes in a Pennsylvania field, after the passenger rebellion. All in less than two hours. A time so short, but enough to plunge millions of people into a nightmare, that will lead in few months to international conflicts, financial crises and social effects in some cases irreversible. The purpose of this essay is to analyse the main consequences of the 9\/11 attacks, especially in the United States of America but also in the \u201cWestern world\u201d, to better understand the real effects of this event, with a focus on the political, legal, social and economic areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"Enrica Neri, Mario Scazzoso<\/strong>, Tutela della salute e regionalismo differenziato. Alle origini di un history case<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract <\/strong>\u2013 The complex relations between central and local governments have always been under the lens of the academic analysis, from both a juridical perspective as well as a political and institutional perspective. The present state of global sanitary emergency, with its deep impact on the delicate balances among the main constitutional bodies, has revived in many countries the centereriphery dichotomy, extremely evident in the decision-making process related to the sanitary containtment\u2019s measures. In Italy, the need of granting the health protection as one of the fundamental principles of the Republican Constitution of 1948, has brought the central government to resort frequently to the Decrees of the President of the Council of Ministers (DPCM). A purely administrative tool adapted to the State of emergency, the DPCM \u2013 especially the first ones \u2013 represent a form of high discretionary decision-power exercised by the Council of Ministers and, ultimately, by the President of this governmental collegial body. By imposing a series of sanitary measures which impacted primarily on the individual liberty as well as on the right to work and, ultimately, on the entire national economic system, the introduction of DPCM unleashed a heated political debate about the correct distribution of competences between center and periphery \u2013 considered, especially that, since the constitutional reform of 2001 all the regional governments enjoy a substantial autonomy in the management of the public health system. Given these premises, the aim of this essay is to show how this bitter partitical confrontation about center-periphery relations in a state of sanitary emergency is nothing but
another evidence of both the missed fulfillment of the regionalist project contained in the Italian Constitution, and, consequently, a serious systemic Italian problem in overcoming the centralist model of government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gli Autori<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can download the full magazine files in PDF by clicking here<\/a><\/strong><\/em>, in ePub by clicking here<\/em><\/strong>, in mobi (Kindle format) by clicking here<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Questo numero segna una tappa importante nella vita della rivista:  dieci anni dall\u2019inizio delle pubblicazioni e venti numeri pubblicati.  Indice Massimo de Leonardis, Introduzione Massimo de Leonardis, Ottavio Bari\u00e9: Maestro di studi storici e gentiluomo Massimo de Leonardis, Santa Sede e Inghilterra: dalla rottura delle relazioni diplomatiche al Congresso di Vienna (1559-1814) Abstract \u2013 One of…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":945,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archivio"],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":1,"label":"Archivio"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-721x1024.jpg",721,1024,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"Redazione EDUCatt","author_link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/author\/redazione\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":1,"name":"Archivio","slug":"archivio","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":26,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":1,"category_count":26,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Archivio","category_nicename":"archivio","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":false,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-scaled.jpg",1804,2560,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-211x300.jpg",211,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-768x1090.jpg",768,1090,true],"large":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-721x1024.jpg",721,1024,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-1082x1536.jpg",1082,1536,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-1443x2048.jpg",1443,2048,true],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/QDSP_20_2021-8x12.jpg",8,12,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Redazione EDUCatt","author_link":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/author\/redazione\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Questo numero segna una tappa importante nella vita della rivista:  dieci anni dall\u2019inizio delle pubblicazioni e venti numeri pubblicati.  Indice Massimo de Leonardis, Introduzione Massimo de Leonardis, Ottavio Bari\u00e9: Maestro di studi storici e gentiluomo Massimo de Leonardis, Santa Sede e Inghilterra: dalla rottura delle relazioni diplomatiche al Congresso di Vienna (1559-1814) Abstract \u2013 One of...","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=943"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1039,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/943\/revisions\/1039"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qdsp.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}